Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> I got the impression that people are generally happy with what >> setuptools provides for version parsing and comparison. >> >> Does anyone think that's not a good model? > > Procedurally, I think it's a very bad approach. I don't mind > the setuptools implementation being used as a basis (assuming > it gets contributed), but *independently* I think a specfication > is needed what version strings it actually understands. Such > specification must precede the actual implementation (in distutils). Agreed. Specifications first, for all of this work.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4