On Mar 27, 2009, at 3:24 PM, skip at pobox.com wrote: > I thought one of the arguments for zip files was a performance > increase > (reduced stat(2) calls, etc). I may misremember though. You're memory is working fine, but I don't think the way eggs are used accomplishes that. The measurements that supported that performance assertion were made by putting the standard library in a single ZIP, and using that. I don't have measurements handy, but I recall being told by someone who did that using a *lot* of separate ZIP files wasn't as effective. -Fred -- Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4