On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 18:05, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > An ars technica articla just linked to in a python-list post > > > http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars > > calls the following project "Google launched" > http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan > > (Though the project page does not really claim that.) > I am sure some people here might find this interesting. > > I'd love to have a faster CPython, but this note: > "Will probably kill Python Windows support (for now)." > would kill merger back into mainline (for now) without one opposing being > 'conservative'. > Well, that's "for now". It is brand new and still under active development. View it as a long term development branch. This is not about to replace CPython suddenly since work on Unladen just started. > > If one adds type annotations so that values can be unboxed, would not > Cython, etc, do even better for speedup? Nope as Unladen is planning to re-implement the eval loop, something Cython doesn't optimize without the need to suddenly start adding type annotations to code. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090326/2bf1bcef/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4