-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > If it really is a common habit to have single-file modules with > associated data files directly rooted under a namespace package, we > could change the API to allow passing in a module and have it be > interpreted as "find the data as sibling files of this module." But > when given a package I would still prefer that it would look inside > the package. But to avoid ambiguities when something that's a module > in one version but a package in another I would really prefer to avoid > this. Yes, it should look inside a package. Very often, a data directory will be made a package through the addition of a __init__.py just so the data can be found. There are often no other py files in such data packages. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBScxF/nEjvBPtnXfVAQJSrQP/UutsevR7ZL62snMQP++rb0lC8R7u5Uva KlZkYnro0Y9jzlld1CnAGxMtmzFHYvo7iwfQ6uHEzpDehwN+dqwxnkefTT42X5OT 3o3prDFSdIsBlQdC4JIUn5wxLfHR2LLEB3RL7RROmPfJmhM0+hzidsI0i9rBb84U B41I6O2+2jI= =aZ43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4