-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 26, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Olemis Lang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> > wrote: >> >> BTW, under a better name, I would support putting pkg_resources in >> the >> stdlib. >> > > ... or a subset of it ? or integrating its features with PEP 302 ? ... > Sounds interesting to me ... > > /me thinking aloud > > ... perhaps unifying these features with loaders in standard PEP 302 > is the way ... :-ยง ... dont see the point of having an isolated module > for doing what loaders should do ... including that there are plans to > do it already ... thereby duplicating functionality in loaders and > ResourceManager, and so on ... > > And'u ? What d'u think ? Let me clarify my position: I just want the functionality (preferably in the stdlib); I don't really care how it's spelled (except please not pkg_resource.whatever() :). Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBScv4o3EjvBPtnXfVAQLDQQQAsW6so3MMUgGQHndEAkESZSIFNlyTPPtr ZfAtRcS3y1v+f6qrab7hxY+GTNKhAJnnWEtKbDwzG5NcFMttCKAJQyFr7HL1tvAA 9dbbskN3qjFtjTQ5tz/DJb87pWtFfuisWGp6DWxaUKCVOYWohXxpE/KyGj8KXjOK d+YAPJeLtDM= =Lg0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4