Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > "Batteries included" > is the status quo for the (C) Python project, and I personally don't > see a strong reason to change that policy until those who favor a > package-manager-based solution have a package manager that satisfies > them! Beautifully put :) And a package based solution that satisfies everyone (or even a significant majority), be they on Windows, OS X, .deb based Linux, .rpm based Linux, some other Linux or *nix, be they a mere user or the machine admin... I think that's a problem that still has a lot of development work in front of it ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4