Nick Coghlan wrote: > Everything I've seen from Daniel so far seems to be about either making > things we already do more efficient, or else providing additional > features in ways that don't make the tools any more confusing for others > already used to a particular way of doing things. So he seems to be > navigating this particular minefield pretty well so far. Thanks a lot Nick! :) BTW, it seems there's a procedure to follow if my navigation fails[1]. > Then again, I may be a little biased - some of the recent bug tracker > changes are things I had wished for in the past, but never chipped in > any code to help make them happen :) Not a problem, sir, we accept RFEs devoid of any code bits in this store :) Cheers, Daniel [1] George: If we do happen to step on a mine, Sir, what do we do? Capt. Blackadder: Normal procedure, Lieutenant, is to jump two hundred feet in the air and scatter oneself over a wide area.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4