A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087490.html below:

[Python-Dev] speeding up PyObject_GetItem

[Python-Dev] speeding up PyObject_GetItem [Python-Dev] speeding up PyObject_GetItemRaymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Tue Mar 24 10:46:31 CET 2009
>> Agreed, and more importantly, I have yet to be convinced that those NULL 
>> checks introduce a measurable slowdown.  Daniel, have you tried 
>> measuring the performance difference with only the NULL checks removed?

I think it highly unlikely that there is a performance difference.
These tend to branch the same way every time, so the 
processor's branch prediction will tend to reduce the check time
to near zero. 


> I think it would be fine to add a special case for lists (*) and dicts in
> PyObject_GetItem(), provided it does make a significant difference in
> performance for these two types.

-1

The API confusion and clutter isn't worth the micro-optimization.
Also, the checks probably do have some value in early detection
of programming errors; it would be ashamed to lose them in 
non-debug builds.  When we get bug reports that are due to 
problems with third-party extensions, it will be harder to know
whether the issue is with the extension or with us.


Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4