RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 24 01:03:41 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087475.html

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:01, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:

> >             I sent this out as a Google Doc a while back, but I just did
> a
> >             proof-reading, converted it, and pushed it live to the
> >             python.org <http://python.org>
> >             <http://python.org>: http://www.python.org/dev/workflow/ .
> >             So now people
> >             who ever triage issues have a guide to follow if they are
> >             not sure how
> >             to set things.
> >
> >
> >         Does that mean PEP 3 should be Withdrawn or does it mean it
> >         should be
> >         replaced?
> >
> >
> >     It should probably be replaced with Brett's document.
> >
> >
> > I say replace as well.
>
> Will then dev/workflow be removed? I don't think we need two
> copies (possibly inconsistent)? So if dev/workflow stays,
> PEP 3 should be withdrawn.

Sorry I wasn't clear; that's what I meant by replace; withdraw PEP 3 and
have a note pointing to /dev/workflow, not turn /dev/workflow into a new
version of PEP 3.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090323/b876e340/attachment.htm>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087475.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issue workflow doc is now live