Terry Reedy <tjreedy <at> udel.edu> writes:
>
> Some of the people who need to support both late 2.x and 3.x would
> prefer to write 3.x code and backport. The OP of a current python-list
> thread asked whether there was any way to write something like
>
> @alias('__nonzero__')
> def __bool__(self): return True
How about simply:
__nonzero__ = __bool__
> I believe my own 3.0 code will mainly also need
> print() to print statement
If this is only about supporting "late 2.x" (i.e., 2.6 and upwards), you can
already write:
from __future__ import print_function
> except e as a to 2.x version
Works in 2.6.
> class C() to class C(object)
__metaclass__ = type
Now I'm not saying that all 3.0 code will work in 2.6 with such simple
precautions, far from it!
Regards
Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4