A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087293.html below:

[Python-Dev] In-place operators

[Python-Dev] In-place operators [Python-Dev] In-place operatorsRaymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Tue Mar 17 23:55:19 CET 2009
[Martin v. Löwis]
>  I would object to their removal, though,
> because it would hurt my sense of symmetry.

I wasn't going to propose removal.  If everyone had
agreed that the operator in-place functions were
problematic, I was going to suggest moving their
docs to a second page and documenting their limatations
(like we had done long ago with some of the builtins
that were no longer essential and had become obsolete).
That would leave the main page full of the operator
functions that have real utility.

But, if we want them to remain first-class citizens,
they are probably fine where they are.


Raymond

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4