A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087292.html below:

[Python-Dev] In-place operators

[Python-Dev] In-place operators [Python-Dev] In-place operators"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Tue Mar 17 23:43:37 CET 2009
> I give up.  My original question was whether anyone thought these
> were a good idea. Look's like the answer is yes,

Correct.

> everyone is happy with
> the functions and are glad they were added in 2.5.

No. I don't really care - I don't use them, nor do I use anything
else of the operator module (so I wouldn't miss it if it was
removed entirely). I would object to their removal, though,
because it would hurt my sense of symmetry.

Regards,
Martin

P.S. If anything was to be removed, I would remove the in-place
operations altogether; i.e. a+=b should always be a=a+b. Allowing
them to be in-place complicates matters for little added value.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4