A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087286.html below:

[Python-Dev] In-place operators

[Python-Dev] In-place operators [Python-Dev] In-place operatorsBenjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Tue Mar 17 22:54:51 CET 2009 
2009/3/17 Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com>:
> Does anyone think it was not a good idea to put in-place operations in the
> operator module?  For some objects, they don't map() as well as their
> regular counterparts.  Some in-place operations rely on the interpreter to
> take care of the actual assignment.   I've not yet seen good use cases for
> operator.isub() for example.

I thought the point of the operator module (unlike most modules) was
to provide a comprehensive set of Python operators as functions for
consistency even if there usefulness was questionable.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4