On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > You didn't include all the code - so impossible to match the exact > semantics. Breaking out of multiple loops with a return is a cleaner way to > handle it IMHO. I don't really see why this is cleaner; they're both just structured gotos. Heck, the code even looks practically the same. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4