Aahz <aahz <at> pythoncraft.com> writes: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > R. David Murray <rdmurray <at> bitdance.com> writes: > >> > >> You will note that what > >> I suggested was that applications that _use the sync feature_ make > >> it user controllable. > > > > I'm sorry, but if it has nothing to do with Python itself, perhaps we > > could stop this subthread (or move it to another ML)? There are enough > > messages already. > > <blink> Yes, this *is* about Python: how should Python support David's > use-case? Python already has plenty of mechanisms for enabling configuration choices, so I don't see your point: the use case is /already/ supported assuming there is a sync() method at all. The discussion is (or should be) about whether/how Python should expose a sync() facility in its file input/output stack (or somewhere else in the stdlib). Configuration policies are not for us to decide.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4