Scott Dial wrote:
> Aahz wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> After Hrvoje's message, let me rephrase my suggestion. Let's instead allow:
>>> open(..., sync_on="close")
>>> open(..., sync_on="flush")
>>>
>>> with a default of None meaning no implicit syncs.
>> That looks good, though I'd prefer using named constants rather than
>> strings.
>
> I would agree, but where do you put them? Since open is a built-in,
> where would you suggest placing such constants (assuming we don't want
> to pollute the built-in namespace)?
>
I actually prefer strings. Just like 'w' or 'r' in open().
Or why not add "f" "c" as modes?
open('file.txt', 'wf')
open for writing, sync on flush
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4