Christian Heimes <lists <at> cheimes.de> writes: > > In my initial proposal one and a half hour earlier I suggested 'sync()' > as the name of the method and 'synced' as the name of the flag that > forces a fsync() call during the close operation. I think your "synced" flag is too vague. Some applications may need the file to be synced on close(), but some others may need it to be synced at regular intervals, or after each write(), etc. Calling the flag "sync_on_close" would be much more explicit. Also, given the current API I think it should be an argument to open() rather than a writable attribute.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4