On 11/03/2009 1:55 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Christian Heimes<lists at cheimes.de> wrote: >> Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>> Christian Heimes<lists<at> cheimes.de> writes: ... > Let's not think too Unix-specific. If we add such an API it should do > something on Windows too -- the app shouldn't have to test for the > presence of the API. (And thus the API probably shouldn't be called > fsync.) This is especially true given Windows has recently introduced a transactional API for NTFS. Although the tone is - err - gushing - it (a) should give some information on what is available, and (b) was high on my google search list <wink> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163388.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363764(VS.85).aspx Cheers, Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4