Christian Heimes <lists <at> cheimes.de> writes: > > I agree with you, fsync() shouldn't be called by default. I didn't plan > on adding fsync() calls all over our code. However I like to suggest a > file.sync() method and a synced flag for files to make the job of > application developers easier. We already have os.fsync() and os.fdatasync(). Should the sync() (and datasync()?) method be added as an object-oriented convenience?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4