RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 10 19:43:47 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087021.html

Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> This is somewhat covered by components, but it's implicit. Would it be 
> worth making this explicit? I have always wondered if people would be 
> more willing to help out if they could easily search for pure Python 
> code issues if that is as far as they feel comfortable.

If and when I am ready to move from working on documentation issues 
(which seem to becoming fewer as the 3.x transition is completed) to 
code issues, that would be helpful.  What would be really helpful is to 
have library issues tagged and sorted by specific modules (or modules, 
if more than one), but I do not know how that might be done.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087021.html below:

[Python-Dev] reviewing patches