Would there be any interest in augmenting the test case library for the regex stuff? When I was working on PyPy, we were using a simplified regular expression matcher to implement the tokenizer for Python. I was able to take a lot of PCRE's regex tests and port them to test our regular expression implementation (to make sure the DFA's were being optimized properly, etc). I believe the PCRE test library was under a very liberal license, and so we may be able to do the same here. If there's interest in it, I can do the same for Python. Jared On 9 Mar 2009, at 16:07, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Facundo Batista <facundobatista <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Matthew Barnett has been doing a lot of work on the regular >>> expressions > engine >>> (it seems he hasn't finished yet) under http://bugs.python.org/issue2636 >>> . >>> However, the patches are really huge and touch all of the sre >>> internals. I >>> wonder what the review process can be for such patches? Is there >>> someone >>> knowledgeable enough to be able to review them? >> >> All test cases run ok? How well covered is that library? > > I don't know, I haven't even tried it. > > Regards > Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4