I submitted an explanation of this and my proposed modification as issue 5468. http://bugs.python.org/issue5468 - Dan Bill Janssen wrote: > Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009, Dan Mahn wrote: >>> After a harder look, I concluded there was a bit more work to be done, >>> but still very basic modifications. >>> >>> Attached is a version of urlencode() which seems to make the most sense >>> to me. >>> >>> I wonder how I could officially propose at least some of these >>> modifications. >> Submit a patch to bugs.python.org > > And it would help if it included a lot of test cases. > > Bill
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4