Josiah Carlson wrote: > A read callback, a write callback. What about close, error, connect, > and accept callbacks? Yep, all those as well. > I hate to say it (not really), but that's pretty much the handle_*() > methods of asyncore :/ . Well, then, what's the problem? Is there anything else people want that asyncore doesn't provide, or is it just a matter of nailing down the existing API a little? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4