RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 2 22:41:30 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086624.html

On 02/03/2009 22:28, Georg Brandl wrote:
> We're already quite inconsistent with type name casing in the collections
> module, so it wouldn't matter so much.  (Though I'd find symmetry with
> defaultdict pleasing as well.)

Since the odict naming is already so prevalent in the wild, it seems to 
me like that would be the best candidate. (Plus, it's shorter!)

/bikeshedding

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086624.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 372 -- Adding an ordered directory to collections ready for pronouncement