RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 2 22:48:30 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086617.html

Hi,

Georg Brandl <g.brandl <at> gmx.net> writes:

> We're already quite inconsistent with type name casing in the collections
> module, so it wouldn't matter so much.  (Though I'd find symmetry with
> defaultdict pleasing as well.)
We either have the way to be consistent with defaultdict and dict or with
Counter, MutableMapping etc.

I think it's a bit too chaotic already to make a fair decision here.  If we
seriously consider a C implementation it would probably be a good idea to call
it `odict`.  C-Classes are usually lower cased as far as I can see.

Regards,
Armin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/086617.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 372 -- Adding an ordered directory to collections ready for pronouncement