On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> If no one objects, I'd like to push PEP 376 in the "accepted" status >>> and go ahead with its implementation, >>> with continuous feedback at Distutils-SIG as we did to build it. >> >> I think this isn't quite the process. In the past, every PEP required >> BDFL pronouncement, which you should now seek. > > Agreed. While Guido is highly likely to just accept the distutils-sig > consensus on something like this, that doesn't eliminate the need for > him to actually *say* that he is approving the PEP on that basis. Sure, I didn't want to bypass the process, I was not really sure about the right move on this PEP since it was based on the summit decisions, I'll wait for Guido decision, thanks. Cheers Tarek -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4