Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> If no one objects, I'd like to push PEP 376 in the "accepted" status >> and go ahead with its implementation, >> with continuous feedback at Distutils-SIG as we did to build it. > > I think this isn't quite the process. In the past, every PEP required > BDFL pronouncement, which you should now seek. Agreed. While Guido is highly likely to just accept the distutils-sig consensus on something like this, that doesn't eliminate the need for him to actually *say* that he is approving the PEP on that basis. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4