Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090236.html below:

[Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 376
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Something that's been helping me squirrel out "wacky" and "fun" bugs
in multiprocessing is running the tests in a loop - sometimes hundreds
of times. Right now, I hack this up with a bash script, but I'm
sitting here wondering if adding a "loop for x iterations" option to
regrtest.py would be useful to others as well.

Any thoughts? Does anyone hate this idea with the power of a thousand suns?

-jesse

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 376
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone against having a loop option for regrtest?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4