RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 22 01:28:06 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090174.html

Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> Is py3k branch even passing all tests on all buildbots all the time?

As much as other branches do (that is, not much, due to the flakiness of some of
the tests and the lack of buildbot maintenance).

> I don't think
> svn head is the right thing to look at. Also, it's worth noting that
> most big libraries are 2.x compatible only.

For projects difficult enough that they won't be finished before a couple of
years, I think it makes sense to target 3.x. Big libraries will hopefully
migrate gradually. SQLAlchemy recently announced that their current development
version is 100% py3k-compatible (http://www.sqlalchemy.org/news.html#item_1).

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090174.html below:

[Python-Dev] run time error anlysis of python source code