RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 20 00:26:30 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090151.html

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/6/19 Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com>:
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>>
>>> Yet another rather pointless bikeshed: if this becomes policy, maybe it
>>> should get a PEP number < 100, like PEP 5 or 6.
>>
>> +1 -- I was debating whether to say something.
> 
> Is that a +1 to numbering or bike shedding?

+1 to changing the PEP number
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"as long as we like the same operating system, things are cool." --piranha

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090151.html below:

[Python-Dev] draft pep: backwards compatibility