2009/6/19 Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>: > Backwards compatibility seems to be an issue that arises a lot here. I > think we all have an idea of it is, but we need some hard place to > point to. So here's my attempt: Nice :-) A general point - it's probably worth clarifying that you're referring to major releases (2.6 -> 2.7 etc.) here. Minor releases have a strict bugfixes-only policy. > applications and libraries. This is fantastic; it is probably one of a language > designer's most wishful dreams. That's a slightly odd wording. I'm not sure I can think of a better one, though... > This policy applys to all public APIs. These include the C-API, the standard ... applies ... > * The behavior of an API *must* not change between any two consecutive releases. With the exception of compatibility warnings as described below. In practice, I think APIs *do* change, so presumably there must have been a pair of releases between which the change happened. I see what you're trying to say, but I think you overstated things a little. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4