RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 15 23:44:32 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090071.html

Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/6/15 Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu>:
>> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>>
>>> P.S.  If you switch to PendingDeprecationWarning, the example
>>> in the docs should probably be switched to show the one valid
>>> use case (passing in a prepackaged nest of context managers).
>> It could even suggest that it only be used for this, since it may disappear,
>> and that other uses should use the new syntax.  That would give people the
>> best chance of writing future-proof code when they can.
> 
> And if the warning is *not* changed to a PendingDeprecationWarning,
> the documentation could also note the necessary warnings call needed
> to let the example code run warning-free.

I think I like that option even better than downgrading the warning.

I created http://bugs.python.org/issue6288 to make it clear to Benjamin
when I have finished updating the docs.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090071.html below:

[Python-Dev] Iterator version of contextlib.nested