RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 7 23:32:49 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089956.html

Terry Reedy wrote:
> [snip...]
>>
>> I don't think that's a novel idea though - I'm pretty sure it was
>> suggested (and met with general approval) when the idea of a short
>> release cycle for 3.1 was first brought up.
>
> I presume because it has been stated before.
>
> In addition to the question above, I am also trying to provoke thought 
> on the nature and purpose of 2.7.  Backporting features 'if someone 
> feels like it' seems pretty haphazard.  For someone wanting to 
> maintain compatibility across multiple 2.x releases, a random new 
> features may be nearly useless.
>

The "What's new in Python 2.7" list is already very impressive. :-)

Michael

> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk 
>

-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089956.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of 2.7 and 3.2