A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089887.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr)

[Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr) [Python-Dev] Issues with process and discussions (Re: Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr)R. David Murray rdmurray at bitdance.com
Thu Jun 4 03:02:09 CEST 2009
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 at 12:23, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Michael Foord wrote:
>
>>  if you are added as nosy on a tracker item (which happens when you make a
>>  comment or you can do yourself) then you get emailed about new comments.
>
> That's good, but...
>
>>  only going to the tracker to add responses.
>
> is not so good. If the goal is to ensure that all previous
> discussion on a given issue is reliably recorded, then
> email replies ought to be archived under the relevant
> ticket automatically.

As Martin sad, replies work.  Michael was mistaken in thinking you have
to go to the tracker to post a followup (I initially did not know I
could just hit reply either).

You can even open new tickets via email, but I've never tried that.

--David
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4