RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jun 3 23:58:29 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089881.html

[GvR]
>>> Benjamin, what would be involved in removing it? I suppose there's the
>>> module itself, some unit tests, and some docs. (I'm not asking you to
>>> remove it yet -- but I'm asking to look into the consequences, so that
>>> we can be sure to do the right thing before releasing 3.1 final.)

[Benjamin Peterson]
>> As Raymond and Gregory have pointed out in this thread, the library is
>> quite independent as it stands now in the stlib, so should be trivial
>> to remove. Nothing else should be affected.

Guido, have you made a firm decision to remove ipaddr.py from 3.1?
The guys on IRC are chomping at the bit.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089881.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr