On 02:44 am, aahz at pythoncraft.com wrote: >On Tue, Jun 02, 2009, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >>I hope we can learn from this. > >I'm not thrilled with adding more process just because we had a problem >here, and the only obvious solution I see is to require a PEP every >time >a module is added. Based on what I've seen of this discussion so far, >I >think that cure would at this time be worse than the disease. I thought the solution that I just proposed was pretty obvious ;-). But in all seriousness, even if an improvement looks nothing like what I just proposed, it seems like a simple failure of imagination to say that nothing could make this situation better.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4