RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 2 19:56:00 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089827.html

On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:34:11 +0200, "\"Martin v. Löwis\"" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> You seem comfortable with these quirks, but then you're not planning
>> to write software with this library. Developers who do intend to write
>> meaningful network applications do seem concerned, yet we're ignored.
>
>I don't hear a public outcry - only a single complainer.

Clay repeatedly pointed out that other people have objected to ipaddr and
been ignored.  It's really, really disappointing to see you continue to
ignore not only them, but the repeated attempts Clay has made to point
them out.

I don't have time to argue this issue, but I agree with essentially
everything Clay has said in this thread, and I commented about these
problems on the ticket months ago, before ipaddr was added.

Jean-Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/089827.html below:

[Python-Dev] Issues with Py3.1's new ipaddr