Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Terry Reedy<tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: >> Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone<exarkun at divmod.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> True, CPython has C infrastructure. What about the other Python >>>> runtimes, >>>> though? >>>> >>> Perhaps these other Python runtimes could implement the functionality >>> of PC/_subprocess.c and use ctypes for that ? >> Is it sensibly possible to augment a C file with #ifdefs so that it can be >> compiled either as a directly importable module or as a ctypes-accessible >> shared library? >> > > Of course it is posible... Moreover, you could likely reuse 100 % of > code intended for ctypes in implementing the extension module calls > intended for Python. Mac OS X could have some issues though (IIUC, .so > ext modules are not the same as .dylib dynamic libs, though perhaps > ctypes can still dlopen() .so files?) > > However, how that would help these other Python runtimes without C > infraestructure ?? I believe someone just posted that PyPy and IronPython have ctypes and Jython is working on it. That is what triggered this post.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4