A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-July/090560.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 376 - Open questions

[Python-Dev] PEP 376 - Open questions [Python-Dev] PEP 376 - Open questionsP.J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Thu Jul 9 03:07:48 CEST 2009
At 09:38 AM 7/9/2009 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>Eric Smith writes:
>
>  > But I think we've veered into metadata that describes what has been
>  > installed. I don't think that's so useful. As I've said, this is private
>  > to the installers. If 2 installers want to communicate with each other
>  > about what they've installed, then they can agree on that data. I just
>  > don't find it generally useful for all installers, and therefore not
>  > useful for distutils.
>
>ISTM that the problem that it solves is uninstall in the absence of
>the original installer.

Or uninstall where the installer is "setup.py install", actually.


>   Am I to understand that you don't think that
>use case is important?  Or that there's another way to do this?

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4