At 09:38 AM 7/9/2009 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Eric Smith writes: > > > But I think we've veered into metadata that describes what has been > > installed. I don't think that's so useful. As I've said, this is private > > to the installers. If 2 installers want to communicate with each other > > about what they've installed, then they can agree on that data. I just > > don't find it generally useful for all installers, and therefore not > > useful for distutils. > >ISTM that the problem that it solves is uninstall in the absence of >the original installer. Or uninstall where the installer is "setup.py install", actually. > Am I to understand that you don't think that >use case is important? Or that there's another way to do this?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4