Eric Smith writes: > But I think we've veered into metadata that describes what has been > installed. I don't think that's so useful. As I've said, this is private > to the installers. If 2 installers want to communicate with each other > about what they've installed, then they can agree on that data. I just > don't find it generally useful for all installers, and therefore not > useful for distutils. ISTM that the problem that it solves is uninstall in the absence of the original installer. Am I to understand that you don't think that use case is important? Or that there's another way to do this?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4