>> Hehe very nice, thanks for the explanation :) >> >> (thanks to the others too) > > I think is exchange actually a good reminder that the bar for acceptance > of PEP 376 shouldn't be "Addresses every possible packaging issue we can > come up with". That would be setting expectations far too high because > packaging cross-platform is so messy. OTOH, it *is* expected that the PEP explicitly lists aspects that it didn't resolve, so that any reader can find out whether something was discussed and rejected, or not discussed. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4