On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Paul Moore<p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I believe the idea of having different names in 2.x and 3.x would likely >> cause too many problems for simple bdist_* installers of modules that >> use only the common 2.x/3.x language subset, so I'm also -1 on that idea. > > That suits me too. I'm happy for the name to stay as it is. While I'd rather like having an "egg"-free standard, it's a detail compared to the rest, so I'm 0+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4