Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> writes: > 'pydist': accurate, specific and without the disadvantages of the 'egg' > jargon > > PJE points out that existing tools (setuptools, pip, etc) won't be > compatible with the new format at all if it uses a new name, but I am > having trouble seeing that as a *bad* thing. By using a new name for the > directory we *guarantee* that old packaging utilities won't get confused > by the new format (they simply won't acknowledge its existence). > > So +1 for pydist as the directory extension in PEP 376 (for the above > reasons). +1 for the same reasons. Thank you for expressing them. -- \ “We are not gonna be great; we are not gonna be amazing; we are | `\ gonna be *amazingly* amazing!” —Zaphod Beeblebrox, _The | _o__) Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy_, Douglas Adams | Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4