On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:00, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 23:41, Brett Cannon<brett at python.org> wrote: > > If we make it universal I say it should be '2.x' and '3.x'. The whole > 'py' > > prefix is redundant. > > Right, I was aiming for /python/2.x and /python/3.x as well. > > Actually, I currently have /cpython to also make CPython less special > among it's peers, but that idea was met with some resistance on > #python-dev. Don't worry about doing that right now. When the stdlib gets separated out we can revisit this. But for now just leave it as python. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090703/4252740d/attachment-0001.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4