A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085759.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branchNick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 31 06:00:49 CET 2009
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> See above. You claim that doing things the way I recommend will lose
> metadata; I believe this claim is false.

I can see how "svn resolved ." gets it right (now that I understand how
the conflict is being produced and then fixed automatically by svnmerge,
but not actually marked as resolved).

I still don't understand how "svn revert ." can avoid losing the
metadata changes unless svnmerge is told to modify the properties again
after they have been reverted. Or am I misunderstanding SVN, and the
revert command doesn't actually revert property changes?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4