A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085743.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1 [Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Jan 30 18:42:19 CET 2009
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
>
> [Guido van Rossum]
>>
>> Sorry, not convinced.
>
> No worries.  Py3.1 is not far off.
>
> Just so I'm clear.  Are you thinking that 3.0.x will never have
> fast shelves, or are you thinking 3.0.2 or 3.0.3 after some
> external deployment and battle-testing for the module?

I don't know about fast shelves, but I don't think your new module
should be added to 3.0.x for any x. Who knows if there even will be a
3.0.2 -- it sounds like it's better to focus on 3.1 after 3.0.1.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4