-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 29, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > 1. Barry, who is the release manager for 3.0.1, does not like the idea > of the cruft that is being proposed removed from 3.0.1. Personally I > say we continue to peer pressure him as I think a new major release is > not like our typical minor release, but I am not about to force Barry > to go against what he thinks is reasonable unless I am willing to step > up as release manager (and I am not since I simply don't have the time > to learn the process fast enough along with just a lack of time with > other Python stuff). I followed up in a different thread, but just FTR here. I'll continue to RM 3.0. I'll follow the community consensus on specific issues, but if there isn't a clear one and I have to decide, I'll likely take the more conservative path. Appealing to python-dev and Guido is (as always :) allowed. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSYMkjHEjvBPtnXfVAQK/fgP/T4uWwU41k1OEgS6ngXlZvUao3dVh0Hni f+iyeo+cyvWggp6ks1NLoJ+BOH/lpwIybwtuLqUI/FcajctdlOUaTyw2CE2jPjgD SMJID5oj1e/7vpB3Dk26RCIB+trZ6GTg1lC4OjRVn0vrKK/QVRg6dYD2YKcW0Seh fF++3EHxhW0= =TMO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4