Ron Adam wrote: > > > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> Michael Foord wrote: >> >>> Don't we have a pretty-print API - and isn't it spelled __str__ ? >> >> Not really. If it were as simple as calling str(obj), there would be >> no need for the pprint module. > > I agree. And when I want to use pprint, there are usually additional > output formatting requirements I need that isn't a "one size fits all" > type of problem. Like others, I am wary of over-expanding the list of special methods. Perhap format strings could have a fourth conversion specifier, !p (pretty) in addition to !s, !r, and !a.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4