A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085696.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branchBrett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Jan 30 03:52:00 CET 2009
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 18:27, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> There are potential problems with doing it that way [1]. The safer
>> option is to do:
>>
>> svn revert .
>> svnmerge merge -M -F <py3k-rev>
>
> I still don't see the potential problem. If you do svnmerge, svn commit,
> all is fine, right? The problem *only* arises if you do svnmerge,
> svn up, svn commit - and clearly, you shouldn't do that. If, on commit,
> you get a conflict, you should revert all your changes, svn up, and
> start all over with the merge.

I did do that and I still got conflicts.

-Brett
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4