A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085688.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1 [Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Fri Jan 30 01:58:59 CET 2009
A couple additional thoughts FWIW:

* whichdb() selects from multiple file formats, so 3.0.1 would still
   be able to read 3.0.0 files.   It is the 2.x shelves that won't be
   readable at all under any scenario.

* If you're thinking that shelves have very few users and that
  3.0.0 has had few adopters, doesn't that mitigate the effects
  of making a better format available in 3.0.1?  Wouldn't this
  be the time to do it?

* The file format itself is not new or unreadable by 3.0.0.
   It is just a plain sqlite3 file.  Was is new is the ability
   of shelve's to call sqlite.  To me, that is something a little
   different than changing a pickle protocol or somesuch.
 

Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4